Category Alcohol Beverage Control

The Web’s Final Frontier: Online Wine Sales? – James Meléndez / James the Wine Guy

The Wall Street Journal’s article “Web’s Final Frontier: Vintners Face Hurdles Governing Online Sales; Laws Vary by State, County”  A thought provoking title to begin with and a good citation for the wine and alcoholic beverage predicament we find ourselves in today in the United States.

The second paragraph politely in this article says the difficulty in shipping to consumer is a “patchwork of U.S. and state regulations governing alcohol sales…..directly to consumers’ doorsteps a mind-boggling proposition.”  There are an estimated 40,000 alcohol beverage control laws in the US and every state is so vastly different that a 50-state distribution is completely inconceivable and the current beverage control framework is strictly impossible to comprehend let alone work in. Market ideals stop at alcohol beverages door–it is unfortunate and the myriad of extremely outdated and non-sensical laws on the books need a deep scrubbing and better yet many need to be eliminated.  The state’s alcohol beverage control laws are least likely to reform themselves–legislators and a public dancing between enjoying wine and other alcoholic beverages and yet are afraid to demand reform.

On any given day in America someone or rather many people have broken a law didn’t know existed–better yet the alcohol beverage control authorities are at odds with themselves to understand their spun webs of confusion in code and laws.   Having the privilege of working with a few ABC (alcohol beverage control) authorities I had to point out a specific allowance for a permit–if I had not a permit would not have been granted.  The front line of all ABCs are not equipped to deal with the many on and off premise businesses, as well importers, distributors, events and god forbid the public.  The wine, beer and spirits categories are large and complex–regulators have a hard time understanding a lesser-known varietal, regions and many other aspects.

Here is a great illustrative point; it is a scene from a winery tasting room I visited this past year:

Customer:                                I want this shipped to my house in Kansas

Tasting room employee:          I am sorry sir–we can’t ship to Kansas–we are not allowed to do so.

Customer                                 I had wine shipped to my house before

Tasting room employee           I am sorry sir, we can’t

Customer                                 Okay; ship it to my office in Missouri

This article keenly points out that Wine.com pays $2 million in fees and licenses–this is absolutely key to why reform will never happen; those state, city, county, and special government entities are taking in a lot of sin tax.  Very few businesses can afford to pay this steep amount and hence a great recipe from keeping a vibrant wine retailing community from being online, lack of competition and smaller assortments can be insured.

It is one thing to have a licensing requirement–quite another to mandate every aspect of control on alcoholic beverages.  Everything from not allowing an advertised sale to be published but it is okay to have just as long as nobody knows it (Missouri).  Higher alcohol percentage wines above 15% in DC and shipped wines to Texas–never mind that spirits is at least double that…..   Some governmental bodies have also forbidden screw cap–the best explanation for this has been explained to me is that anyone can open this bottle.   Private label is illegal in Idaho and Georgia.  After the repeal of Prohibition states were allowed to make as many non-sense ABC laws as they saw fit–further all governmental bodies could create further regulation by either a special government body or a special zone.

And as this article points out that Wine.com could not ship a food and wine basket to New York–other problems just as ridiculous exist.  Alcohol in food (chocolate liqueurs), who can retail these foods? If a retailer sells both food and wine they have to be quarantined sections.  And also in New York separate entrance and stores are required –think Trader Joe’s in Manhattan–two separate but not necessarily equal stores.

Though prohibition was repealed five generations ago–the after effects lingers on like a bad mid-winter’s cold.  The quest to repeal Prohibition — a public excited to rid it, law enforcement no longer needing to enforce the absurd notion of this Act-everyone was too eager to not look closely at the fine print.  Again, a public will need to push for true reform otherwise it will never happen.  The most regulated good of all time does well here in the US but imagine if there was true competition.  The web’s final frontier, at least, in the US may always be a Mariana Trench of great depth and something that can’t be touched.

¡Salud!

http://www.jamesthewineguy.com

***

Demystifying Wine…One Bottle at a Time from all wine regions around the world.

Read more of my wine reviews:

© 2012 James Meléndez / Jaime Patricio Meléndez / James the Wine Guy— All Rights Reserved. James the Wine Guy also on Facebook, Twitter and most major social medias.

Follow, subscribe, like, browse:             

What Would Have Happened if Prohibition Never Existed? – James Meléndez / James the Wine Guy

History is a precarious topic, at least, with respect to what it means for us now.   Not to tackle the unknowns of the entire history of everything—I do have one question for wine—where would we be today if prohibition never happened?

Ken Burns documentary on prohibition was a great way to understand what happened and it’s undoing.  There were three parts and there could have been part four and five.  The topic was not an incidental speed bump but a long lingering and still far reaching act that we still feel today.   The end of the documentary was both satisfying and yet I kept say … but wait there still more…

I am a former multi-state wine and beer marketing manager and the many obscure, obtuse and non-sensical alcohol beverage control laws linger some where between the completely absurd to the completely out-of-date.   I was watching PBS’s Nightly Business Report and they cited a mention of 40,000 ABC (alcohol beverage control) laws on the books in the 50 United States is staggering.  In many respects alcohol is more regulated the whole process and procedure for distribution of prescription drugs.

The world’s richest and largest wine market in the world is also the world’s most restrictive.  So access to wine and beer and spirits is so uneven and frustrating for the consumer.  Take a listen on any given day in a Napa Valley tasting room…. I hear something like this on each visit:

Consumer: “I got wine shipped to my home state of Kansas from another winery and now you are telling me you can’t ship it?!?!?”

Wine room employee:  “yes, that is right”

Consumer: “okay, ship to my office in Missouri”

Here is a bit of the absurd:

  • Screw cap wine illegal in some wine areas of the country
  • Wine over a certain alcohol percentage—never mind that spirits are also sold in the same state
  • A wine retailer can have a “sale” in Missouri but not advertise it.”
  • You need a permit to get a glass of wine poured in certain areas of Dallas metroplex.  I was at Hillstone’s in University Park and across the street on Preston I could go to another restaurant and not need a permit or club membership
  • State run stores?
  • Separate wine stores from food stores in New York
  • Private label or exclusive labels not legal in some states
  • And there are many, many, many more examples

But what this robs is the experience of wines from around the world to each state.  To a consumer it is a mystery of how to acquire wine from another state.  Or imported wines may be only available in a handful of states and not all.  The US is a great wine market but easily the most precarious on the planet.   There is not other good or service that has this level of scrutiny.  And the alcohol beverage is not only controlled but the least to ride on a wave of total and free market distribution.

The 21st amendment was ratified by 36 states in 1933 from April 10, 1933 (Michigan) to interestingly Utah on December 5, 1933—and that is every 6 and 2/3 days a state ratified this amendment.   And there are some states that never ratified this amendment: 1) Georgia, 2) Nebraska, 3) Kansas, 4) Louisiana, 5) South Dakota 6) North Dakota 7) Oklahoma and 8) Mississippi

If prohibition never happened and I am only speculating what would have happened in subsequent years and culminating today:

  • So many acres would not have been torn up and by that extension more old vines
  • Greater varietal exposure and experience
  • Many states would have had more experience in terms of winemaking
  • More competitive prices for larger production wines; smaller production would probably be exactly where they are today
  • Greater movement across state lines
  • A larger wine market
  • Breadth and depth of experience of winemaking in all states
  • More imports flowing into the United States
  • More exports to other nations
  • Esoterica wouldn’t be so esoterica i.e. what is viewed today as esoteric wouldn’t be such a stark contrast
  • More varietals planted today
  • The world “international varietal” would include varietals from Italy or Spain or elsewhere

But where Ken Burns left off is an opportunity for someone—perhaps myself or others to create a documentary on post-Prohibition today.

I would like to know what you think?  Drop me a line or Tweet out or Social Media shout out!

¡Salud!

***

Demystifying Wine…One Bottle at a Time from all wine regions around the world.

Read more of my wine reviews:

© 2012 James Meléndez / Jaime Patricio Meléndez — All Rights Reserved. James the Wine Guy also on Facebook, Twitter and most major social medias.

Follow, subscribe, like, browse:             

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 16,054 other followers